EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCHES IN ELECTRICITY. BY MICHAEL' FARADAY, \D.C.L., ER.S. FULLERTAN PROFESSOR OF CHEMISTRY IN THE ROYAL INSTITUTION. CORRESPONDING MEMBER, ETC., OF TI1E ROYAL AND IMPERIAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCE OF PARIS, PETERSBURG!!, FLORENCE, COPENHAGEN, BERLIN, GOTTINGEN, MODENA, STOCKHOLM, PALERMO, ETC. ETC. Reprinted from the I’hii.osopiiicai. Transactions of 1831 — 1838. VOLUME I. LONDON : BERNARD QUAR1TCII, 15 PICCADILLY. 1839? [ Facsimile reprint .] PRINTED BY TAYLOR AND ERANCIS 3 RED LION COURT, FLEET STREET. P K E F A C E. I ha. ye been induced by various circumstances to collect in One Volume the Fourteen Series of Experimental Researches in Electricity, which have appeared in the Philosophical Transactions during the last seven years : the* chief reason has been the desire to supply at a moderate price the whole of these papers, with an Index, to those who may desire to have them. The readers of the volume will, I hope, do me the justice to remember that it was not written as a whole , but in parts ; the earlier portions rarely having any known relation at the time to those which might follow. If I had rewritten the work, I perhaps might have con- siderably varied the form, but should not have altered much of the real matter : it would not, however, then have been considered a faithful reprint or statement of the course and results of the whole investigation, "which only I desired to supply. I may be allowed to express my great satisfaction at finding, that the different parts, written at intervals during seven years, harmonize so well as they do. Th^re would have been nothing particular in this, if the parts had related only to matters well ascertained before any of them were written : — but as each pro- fesses to contain something of original discovery, or of iv PREFACE. correction of received views, it does surprise even my partiality, that they should have the degree of con- sistency and apparent general accuracy which they seem to me to present. I have made some alterations in the text, but* tjxey have been altogether of a typographical or grammati - cal character ; and even where greatest, have been in- tended to explain the sense, not to alter it. I have often added Notes at the bottom of the pf ige, as to paragraphs 59, 360, 439, 521, 552, 555, 598, 657, 883, for the correction of errors, and also the purpose of illustration : but these are all distinguished from the Original Notes of the Researches by the date of *Dec. 1838. The date of a scientific paper containing any preten- sions to discovery is frequently a matter of serious im- portance, and it is a great misfortune that there are many most valuable communications, essential to the history and progress of science, with respect to which this point cannot now be ascertained. This arises from the circumstance of the papers having no dates attached to them individually, and of the journals in which they appear having such as are inaccurate, i. e . dates of a period earlier than that of publication. I may refer to the note at the end of the Eirst Series, as an illustration of the kind of confusion thus produced. These circum- . stances have induced me to affix a elate at the top of every other page, and I have thought myself justified in using that placed by the Secretary of the Royal Society on each paper as it was received. An author has no right, perhaps, to claim an earlier one, unless it has received confirmation by some public act or officer. * PREFACE. y Before conbluding these lines I would beg leave to make a reference or two ; first, to my own Papers on Electro-magnetic Potations in the Quarterly Journal of Science, 1822., xii. 74. 18G. 283. 416. and also to my Letter*on Magneto-electric Induction in the Annales de Chimie, li. p. 404. These might, as to the matter, vqry properly have appeared in this volume, but they would have interfered with it as a simple reprint of the “Experimental Researches” of the Philosophical Transactions. Then I wish to l'efer, in relation to the Fourth Series on a new law of Electric Conduction, to Franklin’s ex- periments on the non-conduction of icc, which have been very properly separated and set forth by Professor Bachc, (Journal of the Franklin Institute, 1836. xvii. 183). These, which I did not at all remember as to the extent of the effect, though they in no way antici- pate the expression of the law I state as to the general effect of liquefaction on electrolytes, still should never be forgotten when speaking of that law as applicable to the case of water. There are two papers which I am anxious to refer to, as corrections or criticisms of parts of the Experi- mental Researches. The first of these is one by J acobi, ^Philosophical Magazine, 1838, xiii. 401) relative to the possible production of a spark on completing the junction of the two metals of a single pair of plates (915.)*. It is an excellent paper, and though I have not repeated the experiments, the description of them convinces me that I must have been in error. The second is by that excellent philosopher, Marianini, (Memoria della Societa Italiana di Modena, xxi. 205), and is a critical and experimental examination of vi PREFACE. Series viii, and of the question whether metallic con- tact is or is not productive of a part of the electricity of the voltaic pile. I see no reason as yet to alter the opinion I have given ; but the paper is so very valu- able, comes to the question so directly, and tKe point itself is of such great importance, that I intend at the first opportunity renewing the inquiry, and, if I can, rendering the proofs either on the one side or the other undeniable to all. Other parts of these researches have received the honor of critical attention from various philosophers, to all of whom I am obliged, and some of whose cor- rections I have acknowledged in the foot notes. * There are, no doubt, occasions on which I have not felt the force of the remarks, but time and the progress o£ science will best settle such cases ; and, although I cannot honestly say that I wish to be found in error, yet I do fervently hope that the progress of science in the hands of its many zealous present cultivators will be such, as by giving us new and other developments, and laws more and more general in their applications, will even make me think that what is written and illustrated in these experimental researches, belongs to the by-gone parts of science. MICHAEL EAEADAY. ' Royal Institution, March, 1839. CONTENTS. . jrar. Series I. §. 1. Induction of electric currents 0 §. 2. Evolution of electricity from magnetism .... 27 §. 3. Hew electrical state or condition of matter . . 60. §. 4. Explication of Arago’s magnetic phenomena . 31 Series II. §. 5. Terrestrial magneto-electric induction 140 §. 6. Force and direction of magneto -electric induc- tion generally 193 Series III. §. 7. Identity of electricities from different sources 265 i Voltaic electricity . 268 ii Ordinary electricity 284 iii Magneto-elect licity 343 iv Thermo-electricity 349 v Animal electricity 351 §. 8. Itclation by measure of common and voltaic electricity 361 Note respecting Ampere’s inductive results after 379 Series IV. §. 9. Hew law of electric conduction 380 §. 10. On conducting power generally 418 Series V. §. 11. Electro -chemical decomposition 450 1. Hew conditions of electro- chemical de- composition 453 2. Influence of water in such decomposition 472 3. Theory of electro- chemical decomposi- tion 477 Series VI. §. 12. Power of platina &c. to induce combination . 564 Series VII. §. 11.* Electro-chemical decomposition continued (nomenclature) 661 If 4. Some general conditions of electro-che- mical decomposition 669 5. Volta- electrometer 704 % 6. Primary and secondary results 742 7. Definite nature and extent of electro- chemical forces 783 Electro -chemical equivalents 822 V1U CONTENTS. Par. §.'13. Absolute quantity of electricity iti the mole- , <5ules of matter . . 852 Series VIII. §. 14. Electricity of the voltaic pile 875 ^f 1. Simple voltaic circles 875 % 2. Electrolytic intensity 966 If 3. Associated voltaic circles ; or battery*. . 989 9jj 4. Resistance of an electrolyte to decompo- sition 1007 If 5. General remarks on the active battery, . 1034 Series IX. §. 15. Induction of a current on itself 1048 Inductive action of currents generally 1101 Series X. §. 10. Improved voltaic battery 1119 §. 17. Practical results with the voltaic battery , . 1130 Sorics XI. §. 18. On static induction . . . . « 1161 If 1 . Induction an action of contiguous particles 1161 ^f 2. Absolute charge of matter 1169 *f[ 3. Electrometer and inductive apparatus » . 1179 ^f.4. Induction in curved lines 1215 Conduction by glass, lac, sulphur, &c. . . 1233 If 5. Specific inductive capacity 1252 If 6. General results as to the nature of induc- tion 1295 Differential inductometer 1307 Series XII. If 7. Conduction or conductive discharge, . . . 1320 If 8. Electrolytic discharge 1343 If 9. Disruptive discharge 1359 Insulation 1362 — as spark 1406 as brush 1425 positive and negative 1465 Series XIII. as glow 1526 * — dark 1544 % 10. Convection ; or carrying discharge . . 1562 If 11. Relation of a vacuum to electrical phe- nomena 1613 §.19. Naturo of the electric current c . 1617 its transverse forces 1653 Series XIV, §. 20. Xature of the electric force or forces 1667 §. 21. Relation of the electric and magnetic forces «i 1709 §. 22. Note on electrical oxcitation 17^7 EXPERIMENTAL researches IN ELECTRICITY. FIRST SERIES. § 1. On the Induction of Electric Currents, § 2. On the Evo- lution of Electricity from Magnetism. §3. On a new Elec- trical Condition of Matter . § 4. On Arago's Magnetic Phe- nomena. [Read November 24, 1831.] i. The power which electricity of tension possesses of cau- sing an opposite electrical state in its vicinity has been ex- pressed by the general term Induction; which, as it has been received into scientific language, may also, with propriety, be used in the same general sense to express the power which electrical currents may possess of inducing any particular state upon matter in their immediate neighbourhood, otherwise in- different. It is with this meaning that I purpose using it in the present paper. 2. .Certain effects of the induction of electrical currents have already been recognised and described: as those of magneti- zation ; Ampere's experiments of bringing a copper disc near to a flat spiral ; his repetition with electro -magnets of Arago's extraordinary experiments, and perhaps a few others. Still it appeared unlikely that these could be all the effects which in- duction "by currents could produce ; especially as, upon dis- pensing with iron, almost the whole of them disappear, whilst yet an infinity of bodies, exhibiting definite phenomena of in- 2 Induction of Electric Currents. [Series I. duction with electricity of tension, still remain to be acted upon by the induction of electricity in motion. 3. Further : Whether Ampere's beautiful theory were adop- ted, or any otjier, or whatever reservation were mentally made, still it appeared very extraordinary, that as every electric cur- rent was accompanied by a corresponding intensity of magnetic action at right angles to the current, good conductors of elec- tricity, when placed within the sphere of this action, should not have any current induced through them, or some sensible effect produced equivalent in force to such a current. 4. These considerations, with their consequence, the hope of obtaining electricity from ordinary magnetism, have stimu- lated me at various times to investigate experimentally the in- ductive effect of electric currents. I lately arrived at positive results ; and not only had my hopes fulfilled, hut obtained a key which appeared to me to open out a full explanation of Arago's magnetic phenomena, and also to discover a new state, which may probably have great influence in some of the most important effects of electric currents. 5. These results I purpose describing, not as they w r ere ob- tained, but in such a manner as to give the most concise view of the whole. § 1. Induction of Electric Currents. 6. About twenty-six feet of copper wire one twentieth of an inch in diameter were wound round a cylinder of wood as a helix, the different spires of which were prevented from touch- ing by a thin interposed twine. This helix was covered with calico, and then a second wire applied in the same manner. In this way twelve helices were superposed, each containing an average length of wire of twenty-seven feet, and all in the same direction. The first, third, fifth, seventh, ninth, and eleventh of these helices were connected at tlicir extremities qnd to end, so as to form one helix ; the others were connected in a similar maimer ; and thus two principal helices were produced, closely interposed, having the same direction, not touching any- where, and each containing one hundred and fifty-five feet in length of wire. « 7. One of these helices was connected with a galvanometer, the other with a voltaic battery of ten pairs of plates four inches 3 Nov. 1831.] Induction of Electric Currents . square, with dguble coppers and well charged; yet not the slightest sensible deflection of the galvanometer needle could be observed. 8. A similar compound helix, consisting of six lengths of copper .and six of soft iron wire, was constructed. The result- ing iron helix contained two hundred and fourteen feet of wire, the resulting copper helix two hundred and eight feet; but whether the current from the trough was passed through the copper or the iron helix, no effect upon the other could be per- ceived at the galvanometer. 9. In these and many similar experiments no difference in action of any kind appeared between iron and other metals. 10. Two hundred and three feet of copper wire in one length were coiled round a Targe block of wood ; other two hundred and three feet of similar wire were interposed as a spiral be- tween the turns of the first coil, and metallic contact every- where prevented by twine. One of these helices was connected with a galvanometer, and the other with a battery of one hun- dred pairs of plates four inches square, with double coppers, and well charged. When the contact was made, there was a sudden and very slight effect at the galvanometer, and there was also a similar slight effect when the contact with the bat- tery was broken. But whilst the voltaic current was continu- ing to pass through the one helix, no galvanomctrical appear- ances nor any effect like induction upon the other helix could be perceived, although the active power of the battery was proved to be great, by its heating the whole of its own helix, and by the brilliancy of the discharge when made through charcoal. 11. Repetition of the experiments with a battery of one hun- dred and twenty pairs of plates produced no other effects; but it was ascertained, both at this and the former time, that the slight*deflection of the needle occurring at the moment of com- pleting the connexion, was always in one direction, and that the equally slight deflection produced when the contact was broken, was in the other direction ; and also, that these effects occurred^when the first helices were used (6. 8.). 12. The results which I had by this time obtained with mag- nets led me to believe that the battery current through one wire, did, in reality, induce a similar current through the other b 2 4 Iihluction of Electric Currents. [Series I. wire, but that it continued for an instant only, and partook more of the nature of the electrical wave passed through from the shock of a common Leyden jar than of the current from a voltaic battery, and therefore might magnetise a steel needle, although it scarcely affected the galvanometer. 13. This expectation was confirmed; for on substituting a small hollow helix, formed round a glass tube, for the galvano- meter, introducing a steel needle, making contact as before between the battery and the inducing wire (7. 10.), and then removing the needle before the battery contact was broken, it was found magnetised. 14. When the battery contact was first made, then an unmag- netised needle introduced into the small indicating helix (13.), and lastly the battery contact broken, “the needle was found magnetised to an equal degree apparently as before ; but the poles were of the contrary kind. 15. The same effects took place on using the large compound helices first described (6. 8.). 16. When the unmagnetised needle was put into the indica- ting helix, before contact of the inducing wire with the battery, and remained there until the contact was broken, it exhibited little or no magnetism ; the first effect having been nearly neu- tralised by the second (13. 14.). The force of the induced cur- I rent upon making contact was found always to exceed that of , the induced current at breaking of contact ; and if therefore the contact was made and broken many times in succession, whilst the needle remained in the indicating helix, it at last came out not unmagnetised, but a needle magnetised as if the induced current upon making contact had acted alone on it. . , cflect ma y hc due t0 accumulation (as it is called) at tie poles of the unconnected pile, rendering the current upon first making contact more powerful than what it is afterwards, at the moment of breaking contact. 17. If the circuit between the helix or wire under induction and the galvanometer or indicating spiral was not rendered complete before the connexion between the battery and the in- ducing wire was completed or broken, then no effects were perceived at the galvanometer. Thus, if the batter/ commu- nications were first made, and then the; wire under induction connected with the indicating helix no * g nenx, no magnetising power \yas 5 Nov. 1831.] Induction of Electric Currents . there exhibited,. But still retaining the latter communications, when those with the battery were broken, a magnet was formed in the helix, but of the second kind (11.), i.e. with poles indi- cating a current in the same direction to that belonging to the batter^ current, or to that always induced by that current at its cessation. 18. In the preceding experiments the wires were placed near t